The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Categories: Culture

The organizers of the Northern Virginia Film Festival found a photo on the Internet and used it without the author's permission. Photographer Russell Brammer, of course, did not like it, and he sued the film festival. However, the court's decision did not please the photographer.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The copyright fight began when photographer Russell Brammer discovered that one of his photographs taken in Washington had been cropped and used on the website of the Northern Virginia Film Festival.

Brammer turned to the organizers of the festival and asked to remove the photo from the site. The organizers granted the request and the picture was deleted. But it didn't seem enough to the photographer. He decided to sue the organizers of the festival so that they would pay him compensation.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Note that in the USA there is such a thing as "fair use" (fair use), which refers to copyright law. If certain conditions are met, you can use someone else's work, and it will not be a violation of the law. The judge concluded that Brammer's photo was used for non-commercial purposes and was only informative, besides, the organizers found the picture on the Internet and thought that it was in the public domain. The court proved that the use of the photo did not harm Brammer's commercial activities. As a result, the photographer's claim was rejected and he did not receive any compensation.

The court's decision caused controversy. Stephen Carlyle, a copyright specialist at Nova Southern University, said the court's decision could "seriously undermine the copyright protection that is provided to photographers."

This opinion was supported by lawyer David Kluft.

Keywords: Law | Court | Photographer | Photography

Post News Article

Recent articles

DIY Edible Christmas Tree
DIY Edible Christmas Tree

New Year's is a time to surprise and delight loved ones not only with gifts but also with a unique presentation of the holiday ...

20 restaurants that went too far in trying to be original
20 restaurants that went too far in trying to be original

It's high time to admit that this whole hipster idea has gone too far. The concept has become so popular that even restaurants have ...

18 ingenious inventions, the authors of which should work in NASA
18 ingenious inventions, the authors of which should work in NASA

There is a perception that people only use 10% of their brain potential. But the heroes of our review, apparently, found a way to ...

Related articles

Crazy old pictures of Florida teens
Crazy old pictures of Florida teens

In the fall of 1972, Bill Yates traveled through the countryside in the vicinity of Tampa, Florida. At that time, he was studying ...

He sees the taxi driver?
He sees the taxi driver?

This is an amazing photo project of Mike Harvey: it takes people in his car, and photographs them at the same time, we are about to ...

Britain of the 1960s in the lens of the legendary Bruce Davidson
Britain of the 1960s in the lens of the legendary Bruce Davidson

American documentary photographer Bruce Davidson came to the UK in 1960 for a couple of months on the assignment of Queen magazine. ...